Below are questions developed by the producesrs of Deadline to guide discussions after a viewing of the film. For your blog for the week of 10/25, choose one of the questions under each topic below to be the basis of a response to Deadline.
Race and Class
It is impossible to examine the system of capital punishment in the United States without considering the implication that race and class has on its structure.
• David Keaton was sentenced to death in Florida. Seven years later, he was proven innocent of the crime, exonerated, and released. In Deadline, his brother says, “Growing up black in this state, you know, you really didn’t have a chance when it came to a crime. You know, they say that justice is blind, but justice really isn’t blind.” How would you respond to this statement? From watching the film, what role do you think race plays in capital cases?
• More than 80% of the people who have been executed, have been executed for the murder of white victims. How do you account for this? What effect might this have on perceptions of the justice system among people of color?
• Statistically, people of color and low-income people are more likely to be sentenced to death. Why do you think this is? How might vestiges of legal segregation and historic race-based policies impact the modern U.S. justice system? What measures could be taken to ensure a fairer system of justice?
Law and Politics
Deadline explores the death penalty in a political and legal context. The courtroom is one lens through which viewers can examine capital punishment. The role of politics, and in particular the strong role of Governor Ryan in this case, is also central to the issue.
• The film frequently references the 1972 Furman v. Georgia decision that the death penalty was in violation of the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. The 8th Amendment states: “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” How does this constitutional issue play a role in your opinions for or against the death penalty?
• There are currently over 3,000 men and women sentenced to death in the United States. Approximately 65 percent of American voters approve of the death penalty in states where capital punishment is legal. Why do you think the death penalty is so widely supported in this country? What forces do you think shape public opinion on the death penalty?
The Bigger Picture
Deadline explores the legal, political, and familial aspects of the death penalty within the context of the Illinois justice system. All of these issues can easily be expanded to a broader discussion of justice.
• Deadline depicts two inmates who were wrongfully sentenced and later exonerated (David Keaton and Gary Gauger), and other inmates whose guilt was not in question. Is there one position on the death penalty that you think is satisfactory in all cases? Do you think it is possible for a state to construct a foolproof capital punishment system where there is no risk of executing an innocent person? Is some margin of possible error acceptable?
• Some of Deadline’s most moving scenes consist of testimonials by murder victims’ families during the clemency hearings. What might you say to these family members, if given the opportunity? Where do you draw the line between justice and revenge? What place is there for the wishes and needs of victims’ families within America’s justice system?
• John Allen Muhammad (one of the Washington D.C. snipers) and Timothy McVeigh (one of the Okalahoma City bombers) both received the death penalty after widely publicized trials. Their respective counterparts, Lee Boyd Malvo and Terry Lee Nichols were also found guilty of their crimes in similar trials, yet they received life sentences rather than the death penalty. How do you account for this apparent discrepancy in sentencing for heinous crimes?
• What is your reaction to Stephen Bright’s quote about the exonerated prisoners?
“This was the third person released by the journalism students at Northwestern, and of course it doesn’t say much for our legal system when people spend sixteen years on death row for a crime they… didn’t commit. And that ultimately comes to light not because of the police or the prosecution, or the defense lawyers or the judicial system, but because a journalism class at Northwestern took it on as a class project to see whether or not these people were guilty or not. You know, if those students had taken chemistry that semester, these folks would have been executed.” Stephen Bright, Director, Southern Center for Human Rights